<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mark Horner &#187; Digital Textbook Initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.markhorner.net/tag/digital-textbook-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.markhorner.net</link>
	<description>A blog about mixing technology, education, openness, and experience in South Africa.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:46:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Textbook Initiative in California</title>
		<link>http://www.markhorner.net/2009/10/13/digital-textbook-initiative-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhorner.net/2009/10/13/digital-textbook-initiative-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SF Fellow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Textbook Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OERs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhorner.net/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.markhorner.net/wp-content/uploads/sf_icon_small.png" width="50" height="50" alt="" title="SF Fellow" /><br/>I was quite excited to see a press release from the Office of the Governor for the state of California: Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Legislation Furthering Digital Textbook Initiative. But then I noticed one of the components signed off: SB 48 by Senator Elaine Alquist (D-San Jose) requires that any individual, firm, partnership or corporation that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://www.markhorner.net/wp-content/uploads/sf_icon_small.png" width="50" height="50" alt="" title="SF Fellow" /><br/><p>I was quite excited to see a press release from the Office of the Governor for the state of California: <a title="Press Release from the Governor's Office" href="http://gov.ca.gov/press-release/13561/">Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Legislation Furthering Digital Textbook Initiative</a>. But then I noticed one of the components signed off:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_48&amp;sess=CUR&amp;house=B&amp;author=alquist">SB 48</a> by Senator Elaine Alquist (D-San Jose) requires that any individual, firm, partnership or corporation that offers textbooks for sale at the University of California, the California State University, the California Community Colleges or any private postsecondary education institution in the state, to the extent practicable, make them available, in whole or in part, for sale in an electronic format by January 1, 2020.</p></blockquote>
<p>Before we discuss this further lets remind ourselves of the context. We&#8217;re talking about developments in a digital space, in the world of OERs where the movement has been accelerating significantly this year with projects like <a title="Connexions" href="http://cnx.org">Connexions</a>, <a title="CK12" href="http://ck12.org">CK12</a>, <a title="Flat World Knowledge" href="http://www.flatworldknowledge.com">Flat World Knowledge</a> and <a title="Curriki" href="http://www.curriki.org">Curriki</a> (to name a few) all taking off. In this context, I think this is completely laughable!</p>
<p>Lets think about this for half a second:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>to the extent practicable</strong>: an opt-out clause of note!</li>
<li><strong>in whole or in part</strong>: so if I make a page or two available am I done?</li>
<li><strong>January 1, 2020</strong>: and you&#8217;ve got geological rather than digital timelines to do &#8230;&#8230; nothing!?</li>
</ul>
<p>Perhaps I should dig deeper into it but even if the majority of the content needs to be available, the deadline alone makes this a joke. Collaborative technology and its use will leapfrog this little piece of legislation in the next 18 months. Any publisher clinging to this as a timeline to get their act together regarding the digital distribution of content has just committed suicide.</p>
<p>Even in South Africa we already have almost the entire curriculum available online, just combine the scope of content covered on <a title="Siyavula content on Connexions" href="http://cnx.org/lenses/siyavula">Connexions by Siyavula</a>, the material that can be downloaded from the<a title="Mindset Network" href="http://www.mindset.co.za"> Mindset Network</a> and fill in some gaps with what you can find on <a title="Thutong" href="http://www.thutong.doe.gov.za">Thutong</a>. This is all just my opinion of course.</p>
 <img src="http://www.markhorner.net/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-feed-statistics/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=99" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhorner.net/2009/10/13/digital-textbook-initiative-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

