I was quite excited to see a press release from the Office of the Governor for the state of California: Governor Schwarzenegger Signs Legislation Furthering Digital Textbook Initiative. But then I noticed one of the components signed off:
SB 48 by Senator Elaine Alquist (D-San Jose) requires that any individual, firm, partnership or corporation that offers textbooks for sale at the University of California, the California State University, the California Community Colleges or any private postsecondary education institution in the state, to the extent practicable, make them available, in whole or in part, for sale in an electronic format by January 1, 2020.
Before we discuss this further lets remind ourselves of the context. We’re talking about developments in a digital space, in the world of OERs where the movement has been accelerating significantly this year with projects like Connexions, CK12, Flat World Knowledge and Curriki (to name a few) all taking off. In this context, I think this is completely laughable!
Lets think about this for half a second:
Perhaps I should dig deeper into it but even if the majority of the content needs to be available, the deadline alone makes this a joke. Collaborative technology and its use will leapfrog this little piece of legislation in the next 18 months. Any publisher clinging to this as a timeline to get their act together regarding the digital distribution of content has just committed suicide.
Even in South Africa we already have almost the entire curriculum available online, just combine the scope of content covered on Connexions by Siyavula, the material that can be downloaded from the Mindset Network and fill in some gaps with what you can find on Thutong. This is all just my opinion of course.
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rob Lucas. Rob Lucas said: RT @marknewlyn How seriously should we really take the Californian Digital Textbook Initiative: http://bit.ly/GHs0K [...]
I certainly agree that a deadline of 2020 seems far-fetched and meaningless. Still, i’d hate to link SB48 to the two digital textbook bills the Governor signed into law. These definitely move the initiative forward and encourage publishers and districts to charge into the digital age.
We’re a bit behind Texas which passed two similar bills that went far beyond California’s efforts. HB 4294 would, in addition, allow publishers to re-submit books with new content and allow districts to use textbook funds to subscribe to online, interactive textbooks. HB 2488 authorizes colleges/educational institutions to write an open source textbook for use by K-12 students.
not bad.
now, if only i could find someone to submit books from FHSST to phase two of the Digital Textbook Initiative.
Brian
Hi Brian
I am a big fan of the Digital Textbook Initiative in general and I’m impressed by how rapidly the list of approved books came about. Usually things move very slowly in education (the world over!) so it was quite refreshing to see. That amplified my disappointment at SB48′s 2020 deadline. Ultimately, open textbooks are really ramping up and that will drive the change more so than legislation. This certainly doesn’t hinder anything but I think it will become obsolete because of the pressure from the OER movement.
I dropped the ball on getting the FHSST books into the approval process and will definitely try a lot harder in the next phase.
Cheers
Mark